Nick - there is no life to any of these. I understand they look well to you and that you are an advocate and in this industry but there isn't one of them that has any artistic vision. Art is not about the mechanistic elements which are being combined, mixed, matched and presented here. The images can be seen as satisfactory "placeholders" but they are not illustrations. They do not depict any particular story moment. Nor are they of a nature that would be suitable for a cover of an e-book, audiobook, or print book. A designer would need to adapt them to create a satisfactory (not optimal) result. This is also not "AI" it is compilation of visual elements to produce a visual image. I'm not saying that this cannot become a good tool. What I am saying is that these diverse images are satisfying to you, but would be found boring or uninteresting to the overwhelming majority of human onlookers. Because art isn't about what you have created here. It's about emotion. I'm not saying don't be proud of your work, don't keep working, do not continue to use AI to create artwork, just that I don't think the underlying thing that is art - is what is being done here. Maybe you are creating a new form, and the machine will eventually create silicon art for silicon beings - that's certainly possible. Have you seen the elephants that paint? It has been explained to me that this "miracle" is the elephant that has been trained with cruel tactics to perform movements creating rote paintings. Elephants probably do have their own form of art - but it doesn't involve rote pictures and poster paint and brushes. Same deal here. You have had a response from a world-class sci fi writer that doesn't have time to write her own work due to the way our heinous world works - that's a bigger problem than inventing an engine that can arrange elements of visual representation in endless variety of forms.